Tuesday, November 17, 2015

M. C. Escher's Mastery of the Impossible

Bond of Union
“Are you really sure that a floor can't also be a ceiling?” M. C. Escher once said when referring to how he develops his artwork. In many of M. C. Escher’s artwork, Escher messes with people’s brains by using common assumptions about the world and flipping them on their head. Through Escher’s lifetime, he develops unique style inspired by mathematics to make illusions and optically complex pieces that make the viewer think deeply about the piece. Yet closed off by the world, M. C. Escher influences many mathematicians and artists through his thought provoking pieces. Through mental assumptions and geometry, M. C. Escher creates mathematically inspired art that challenges what people think as possible. In particular, Escher’s Bond of Union explores the infinite complexities of mathematics and relationships.

In the art piece Bond of Union, Escher uses complex geometric designs and human qualities to create a connection between the shapes in the piece. The spiral spheres in the center of the painting connect showing the bond between man and woman. He uses familiar shapes to create comfort and intrigue in the piece. Escher uses the dark shading and lighting to create an immersive atmosphere and focuses on the faces in the print. His use of shapes and repetition enforce the concept that the faces have a bond with each other because every other sphere lacks personality. Escher uses the shapes to describe relationships between people as complex and confusing but somehow works. Escher style of mental imagery transform this print because the complex geometry and advanced lighting create thoughts inside the audience about the meaning and the importance of relationships. What does M. C. Escher do to create these mind bending art pieces and how have they challenged the way people view art.

In order to understand why M. C. Escher was able to produce mind-bending prints, we need to understand where Escher grew up. M. C. Escher was born in Holland and his father was a civil engineer. He wanted to be an architect so he applied to the School for Architecture and Decorative Arts in Haarlem. While at college, Escher discovered his passion for drawing geometric shapes and making mind bending art. Escher moved to Rome and started drawing roman architecture and Italian Countryside. His early art featured heavy Italian influence. With many of his prints, Escher would experiment with lighting and how it was received by the viewer. In 1935, Escher left Italy and started to focus more on “mental imagery” than on landscapes. He dove into metamorphosis and complex architecture mazes like his famous print Relativity. Living in scenic environments and his passion for architecture leads M. C Escher to create art that inspires both beauty and complexity.
Belvedere
Many people have researched M. C. Escher’s work and look at how he creates illusions that look impossible. Researchers have broken down M. C. Escher’s works into five impossible shapes that mess with the brain. Escher uses these shapes with illusions to create complex architecture that confuses the brain. The five types of impossible images that Escher exhibits in his art use the triangle, the stairway, the fork, the Escher Cube and the Steps. Escher uses these images in almost every piece he creates. By adding these pieces to his artwork Escher creates thoughts inside the audience as they try to comprehend the art. Many people can look at his art for hours because of the intricate design and details. For example, M. C. Escher’s famous piece, Belvedere. This piece uses impossible images to create a complexing tower. While observing the structure, one can observe the building’s foundation is built as an Escher Cube. The supports in this piece lie both behind and in front of each other, creating an illusion that messes with the brain. Escher’s uses of this cube was not the only shape he master in his art career.
Waterfall
Another example of impossible shapes used in Escher’s art can be found the Waterfall. In this painting Escher focuses on the impossible triangle. He uses the assumption of gravity to mess with the audience’s minds as the water flows up the duct. Either the water must be going up the duct and down the waterfall or down the duct and up the waterfall. Both of the scenarios that the audience sees establish logically impossible interpretations. Throughout this piece, the brain to constantly try to comprehend it as one looks at it. Escher wants the audience to think about his pieces more so he creates these optical illusions to trick the audience. However since the piece lacks possibility the brain will never fully comprehend what happens in the piece. One must research and dive into why the brain claims this piece cannot exist in reality. Escher takes the basic idea of a duct and spins it to create a mind bending puzzle.

Ascending and Descending
Our last image focusing on impossible images can be found Escher’s Ascending and Descending. This piece conveys the impossible staircase. In one direction, the pathway always rises while in the other direction the pathway always falls. This contradicts the natural law of order tricking the brain into these optical illusions. Escher refers to this piece as a “trick” because the audience can imagine a building that would be built like this. Escher’s uses the impossible staircase to create the illusion of movement and rise and fall in his create. By putting this in his creation it gives the audience the illusion that the piece constantly changes and encourages the audience to look deeper into the print. Escher’s mastery of impossible shapes boosts him into art history because he was able to create things people thought were impossible.
Relativity
Escher not only uses impossible shapes in his artwork, he also uses unique themes to create intrigue in the audience. By theming his art, Escher can resonate with his audience more and make a lasting impact. Escher was interested in the impossible and what others comprehend and that reflects in his pieces. He wanted to challenge the natural assumptions of the audience and the more the audience studied the art the more they would find. His love for “tricking” and creating optical illusions allows Escher to create meaningful art that will be appreciated by many. For example, the piece Relativity uses the theme of relativity to create a unique piece of art. This outstanding piece perfectly describes relative as a theme. The piece features many staircases that wrap around to create a masterpiece. At first glance this piece looks impossible, however upon further inspection, one can comprehend the piece. Bruno Ernst, author of “The Magic of M. C. Escher,” broke down this print into three categories: left-learners, right-learners, and uprights. Each kind inhabits their own environment properly and that creates three possible views for the piece. The piece creates what seems like an impossible image with three different universes with different gravities at the same time. Escher uses these three views to create a different piece for everyone who sees the print. The multiple views cause the piece to constantly change as the audience inspects it. With mastery of relativism, Escher creates three different world within the same print that creates a unique experience for the viewer.

Print Gallery
Another theme Escher experiments with through his art career focuses on the transition between 2D and 3D. Escher creates many pieces that combine two dimensional world with three dimensional worlds. In the piece, Print gallery, Escher has a boy looking at a two dimensional painting that becomes a three dimensional town. This strange piece uses the contradiction of dimensional shifts to confuse the audience. The shifts between dimensions creates an illusion that the audience looks at the gallery painting when in reality one is observing the piece inside a piece. This confuses piece conveys the magic of diving into an undiscovered piece and becoming part of its world. This illusion of dimensions inspires the audience to look at each painting like it’s an actual world and not just a painting. Escher’s use of dimensions create an impossible image that summarizes his experiences with art.

Cube with Magic Ribbon
The last theme discussed in this post will focus on inversion or having the characteristics of two separate things but not being full one thing. Escher uses this confusing theme in many prints to invoke thought and challenge the audience. A good example of this theme happens in his piece, Cube with Magic Ribbon. This piece looks simple at first glance by having a cube with a ribbon inside it. However upon further inspection, the ribbons actually create two Mobius strips that loop throughout the print. The ribbon uses inversion because the ribbon looks as if it lies either inside or outside the cube and either on one side or the other side. This mind bending puzzle’s simplicity and polish makes it seem easy to figure yet it still confuses the audience. Escher’s use of themes develop creations that seem impossible to conceive.

In conclusion, Escher’s art has become well know all over the world for being confusing and mathematical. His use of geometry and mental assumptions, Escher leads the audience into a world where anything can be what the person sees. His art has inspired people all over the world and challenges the minds of his audience. Through M. C. Escher’s life he was surrounded by great architecture and using his passion for architecture, Escher created some of the most important pieces in art history. In the piece, Bond of Union, Escher’s thought invoking style has made people question what their eyes see. M. C. Escher enjoys challenging the audiences’ assumption of possibility by tricking them with their assumptions and geometry.



Works Cited:









Monday, November 9, 2015

The Triumph of Venice: Mid-Unit Post

Photo from http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/149778

“Peace and War”

This is another painting by Pompeo Girolamo Batoni. This picture is relevant to the painting I chose to do my Unit 4 project on because it further shows the style of painting that was most popular during the time period. The painting “Peace and War” also references Roman mythology. In this painting Roman gods are used to compare peace and war.
Photo from http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/time-unveiling-truth-33707

“Time Unveiling Truth”

This is a painting by the Italian painter Giovanni Battista Tiepolo that was painted during the same time period as Pompeo Girolamo Batoni. This painting follows the theme of the time period of using paintings as allegories. It uses personification to represent none human things like in the “Triumph of Venice”. The painting also uses objects to represent other themes present in the painting.
Photo from http://www.artclon.com/paintings/thetis-takes-achilles-from-the-centaur-chiron_4323.html

“Achilles and the Centaur Chiron”

This is another of Pompeo Girolamo Batoni’s famous paintings. Although this piece was painted at a later time, it still possess some of Batoni’s and the Golden Age of Venice’s common traits in artworks. This painting uses Roman mythology to express Italian culture. The media is also oil on canvas which was the popular way of doing paintings at the time. 
Photo from http://www.wikiart.org/en/raphael/school-of-athens-detail-from-right-hand-side-showing-diogenes-on-the-steps-and-euclid-1511
“The School of Athens”

This is a piece by Anton Raphael Mengs after the artist Raphael. This painting is relevant to “The Triumph of Venice” because it is also a piece of neoclassical art which is what Batoni was most known for. Neoclassicism is the taking inspiration from “classic art” and culture of Ancient Greece or Ancient Rome and creating new pieces of visual art, literature, theatre, music, and architecture. Meng’s was also considered Batoni’s greatest rival, so I feel like comparing the two’s styles is important in understanding neoclassicism.
Photo from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_the_Horatii


“Oath of the Horatii”

This is a painting by the French artist Jacques-Louis David. The painting is depicting a scene from Roman legend, the fighting between the two cities of Rome and Alba Longa. Its theme is the self-sacrifice for one’s country and patriotism. This painting relates to “The Triumph of Venice” because it is another piece of neoclassicism, thus expressing Ancient Roman culture and legends. This particular piece became one of the best known paintings in the neoclassical style.

Bond of Union



The painting was made by M. C Escher and emphasizes metamorphosis in art. Once the viewer focuses on one point and starts exploring the painting it constantly changes into something else. This painting also shows how M. C Escher uses math to created geometric paintings that interest the viewer.

This piece of art was made by Octavio Ocampo and uses metamorphosis to create two worlds inside one painting. This painting changes between mountains and horses depending on how you look at it. Its unique style differs from that of M. C. Escher, but Ocampo uses the same concepts as Escher to create amazing pieces of art.

This painting uses symmetry to create a flowing painting that emphasizes unity between everything in the painting. The symmetry and the shape of this art follows a similar display as M. C. Escher’s Bond of Union. This creator uses geometry in his shapes to create a pattern that people can appreciate.

This painting by Van Gogh uses unity to create a painting that flows and feels like one. Gogh uses the swirling brush strokes and color palettes to create unify the world. It creates a atmosphere of being together and the feeling of everything belongs together.


This painting uses metamorphosis to create an illusion of two things happening at the same time. This style is used in M. C. Escher’s paintings and helps painting carry multiple meanings. The painting has flow through its colors by using red on the face and gray in the background.

The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius Mid-Unit 4 Post

Photo by Sigmund
In The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius, most of the painting is taken up by Mount Vesuvius itself. This volcano is important in this painting because it was this volcano that destroyed the city of Pompeii, the city in the painting. Most of the painting itself consists of oranges and grays or blacks, but the only place the orange is really shown is on Vesuvius. This draws the most attention to the mountain itself. The artist made the mountain very large, in comparison to the rest of the painting, in order to draw more attention to it. This image relates to the painting, as it is an image of the monstrosity that is, Mt. Vesuvius.

Photo by William Chevillon
This painting, painted by Pierre-Jacques Volaire, is The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius. Volaire was the son of the official town painter in Toulon, France. It can be said that it was in his genes to be a painter. Volaire’s work centralizes around landscapes, and he has done several pieces on Mount Vesuvius. The life of Volaire is not really quite detailed, as there is not much documented about his life. He was not the most famous painter and his works were not the grandest works one could see. Despite the unpopularity of his works, as you can see in this image, what he did was pretty impressive.

Photo by cliff hellis
In many of his paintings, Volaire would paint landscapes. Landscape paintings can be dated back to ancient times, and after the fall of the Roman empire, they seemed to die off. They were viewed as religious or figural pieces, and it was not until the 17th century that they began to regain popularity. This image in particular is a view from the mountain Vesuvius. Landscapes can be breathtaking pieces, such as The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius. The different colors combined with the layering of the people, city, water, and mountain, create a stunning work of art that seems to extend for miles within it. 

Photo by cliff hellis
Pompeii was the ancient city destroyed by Mount Vesuvius. In this image, a small portion of modern day Pompeii is shown. We have learned much of what we know about ancient Roman times from what we have uncovered from Pompeii. Since the city was burned and covered with volcanic ash in such a brief and quick instant, much of what Pompeii held has been preserved. This allowed archaeologists to learn so much about what life was like so many years ago. The painting depicts Pompeii in the middle of the painting, and due to its close proximity to Vesuvius, Pompeii really did not have much of a chance after an eruption of that magnitude.

Photo by Forest Service
The last picture is a picture of Mount St. Helens in Washington state erupting in 1980. Although less catastrophic than Vesuvius, the eruption of Mount St. Helens still shows the magnitude of volcanic eruptions and the dangers that come with them. This image is relates to the painting because volcanic eruptions are not just an everyday occurrence. They are devastating events that have been and will continue to be studied by scientists as to find out more on why and when. The people of Pompeii serve as great examples as to why volcanoes are not just mountains that make smoke every so often.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Mid Unit Post

Photo By: Mike Fiechtner
This photo of Liberia is significant because it is where the original image was taken. Liberia is a country on the West African coast and was one of the more stable African countries before the civil war took place in 1989. Liberia is also very poor and was once known as one of the prosperous black republics in the 1950s.

This photo was taken by a news photographer named Chris Hondros during Liberia's 14-year civil war. The man in the photo is Joseph Duo, a Liberian commander who had just finished firing a rocket launcher towards the enemy during battle. Hondros snapped the photograph as Duo jumped in the air and gave a war cry. The image then became famous and was placed in magazines all over the world. It became a symbol of the prolonged conflict taking place in the country of Liberia.

 
Photo By: smiletiger
These Liberian soldiers relate because the Liberian soldier in the original piece is named Joseph Duo and is the focal point of the artwork. The Armed Forces of Liberia is now as the AFL and has origins traced back to a militia that was formed by the first black colonists in what is now Liberia.  It was founded as the Liberian Frontier Force in 1908, and retitled in 1956.
Photo By: Davor Pavelic
The first Liberian Civil war was an internal conflict in Liberia that lasted from 1989 to 1997. This killed over 200,000 people and eventually led to the involvement of the Economic Community of West African States and of the United Nations. The peace did not last long, and in 1999 the Second Liberian Civil War broke out.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Soccer in America



Works Cited

Collins, Sandra. (2006, July). Soccer & Society. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=d559eda0-a2ee-4eb2-8e09-0de3d41dfabb%40sessionmgr120&vid=0&hid=101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=20917294&db=a9h.

Fitzgerald, Daniel. (2013, September 22). 15 Reasons Soccer Is the Best Sport in the World. Retrieved from http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1783623-15-reasons-soccer-is-the-best-sport-in-the-world.

Kels, Dayton. (2015, September 9). 7 Reasons Why Soccer is the Dumbest Sport Ever. Retrieved from http://sportzedge.com/2014/07/01/7-reasons-why-soccer-kind-of-sucks/.

Kruschewsky, Gabriela. (2014, May 14). Wake Up, America. Here’s Why Soccer is the World’s Best Sport. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/14/soccer-worlds-best-sport_n_5248061.html.

Paine, Neil. (2014, June 16). Why Isn’t the U.S. Men’s National Team Better at Soccer?. Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-isnt-the-u-s-mens-national-team-better-at-soccer/.

Sports Fans; The Good and The Bad



Works Cited

Rudd, A. (2010, December 1). An Exploratory Investigation of Sportsmanship Attitudes Among College Student Basketball Fans. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/792664610?pq-origsite=summon



Almendrala, A. (2015). How Being A Sports Fan Makes You Happier And Healthier. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/30/sports-fan-mental-health-benefits_n_6565314.html



Jacobson, B. (n.d.). The Social Psychology of the Creation of a Sports Fan Identity: A Theoretical Review of the Literature. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol5Iss2/FanDevelopment.htm



(n.d.). Retrieved October 31, 2015, from https://www.saintmarys.edu/files/drach final draft.doc