Tuesday, November 17, 2015

The Triumph of Venice

Photo by: Irina 
The painting The Triumph of Venice depicts a scene where a clothed woman is being pulled on a triumphal car by two winged lions surrounded by what appears to be men and women dressed in Roman battle armor and traditional clothes with the Grand Canal in the background. Upon first glance, one would think this is a seemingly odd painting, but each person and object present is symbolic of Venice during this time period. “The Triumph of Venice” was painted by the Italian painter Pompeo Girolamo Batoni in 1737 during a time period in Venice known as The Golden Age of Venice and is an example of neoclassical art. Neoclassicism originated in Rome, but became popular in France as French art students came home with newly rediscovered Greco-Roman ideals (Neoclassical Art Movement). Characteristics of neoclassicism in paintings include clear and sharp outlines, people looking polished and statue like, and dressed in Greek robes and Roman togas (Neoclassical Art Movement). Batoni is famous for his neoclassical pieces and this particular painting is a prime example of what neoclassical art was all about. Unlike during Pompeo Girolamo Batoni’s life, his paintings are now viewed with significance and are important in representing life and art in Italy during The Golden Age of Venice.

The Triumph of Venice is oil on canvas which is a typical media used by artists during this time period. The painting consist of mostly warmer colors like yellows, reds, and browns that make up the people and buildings depicted while on a backdrop of cooler colors like blue which make up images of the Grand Canal and sky. Warmer tones are used to convey feelings of excitement and happiness, so it makes sense that Batoni’s painting consist of mostly warmer colors because The Triumph of Venice celebrates the rebirth of the fine arts in the Venetian Republic. These feelings are further emphasized placed against the cool background of the painting which is relatively dull compared to the rest of the piece created by Batoni, but it also gives viewers a sense of location. Batoni’s choice of colors are used to express feelings of enthusiasm and anticipation for the return of importance of the arts in Venice and for its bright future ahead.

Photo by: faungg's photos
The painting is centered around a womanly figure being carried on a triumphal car pulled by winged lions and is surrounded by other men and women all of which are dressed in ancient Roman attire. Upon further review and research, one learns that the woman centered in the painting represents the city of Venice and the winged lions represent St. Mark and symbolize the city of Venice and formerly the Republic of Venice (Humanities Web). The people surrounding the woman on the chariot are of significance as well. To her left on the cart, the Doge (governor of The Republic of Venice) Lionardo Loredan is portrayed gesturing towards Ceres (the Roman goddess of agriculture and grain), excepting harvest offerings (Humanities Web). Other Roman gods and goddesses are illustrated in the painting like the goddess Minerva who is the patroness of the fine arts, Poseidon who is the mythological patron of the Venetian Republic and is shown pointing towards the city Mars, and Mercury the messenger god who is shown presenting the history of the Republic of Venice’s achievements to a group of old sages (Humanities Web). Above the woman that represents Venice, are the figures of Fame, but particularly double-faced History whose older face is looking back at the Republic of Venice’s glorious past while her younger face is looking towards Venice’s bright and prosperous future (Humanities Web). All of the figures presented in Batoni’s painting are used to represent the city of Venice and celebrate the rebirth of the fine arts in the city. He uses the neoclassical style of art to make these representations through Roman gods and goddesses to depict the return of the arts and also to show the prosperity of Venice during this specific time period.

Photo by: Sean
The Triumph of Venice was painted in 1737 during a period in Venice known as the Golden Age of Venice. This was a prosperous time period for The Republic of Venice, crops flourished and the fines arts had returned to Italy. Probably the greatest influence on the fine arts and Pompeo Girolamo Batoni during this time period was a trip now known as The Grand Tour. During Batoni’s time The Grand Tour was considered a mobile finishing school in arts and manners, thus many aspiring artists traveled throughout Italy studying pieces of art and the artists that created them. Visiting cities like Venice and Rome was a must due to their growing reputations during this time period as places that possess treasures in the fine arts. It is through this tour how the style of neoclassical art and Batoni gained popularity in Europe, but it wouldn’t be until modern times when Batoni and his works would be considered of importance and respected. Batoni specialized in and is most known for painting portraits. British customers of noble origin would go on The Grand Tour particularly to get Batoni to paint portraits of themselves. It is through this process how Batoni gained huge popularity in the United Kingdom and came to paint portraits of high class government officials and kings and queens. Italian artist praised him, while non-Italian artist considered him unimportant. During his life, Batoni’s works were considered insignificant in the eyes of artists outside of Italy due to his cheap prices and willingness to please and paint exactly what buyers asked of him (Pompeo Batoni…). What other artist were seeing as irrelevant, is known seen to be of great importance in preserving the history of neoclassical art and revealing the artistic taste of locals and visitors to Rome and Venice in eighteenth-century Italy.

Photo by: Peter Roan
After further review, it makes sense as to why Batoni depicted The Triumph of Venice the way he did. He followed the trends of neoclassicism by painting its characteristics like depicting people in traditional Roman/Greek clothing, including clear/sharp outlines, and people appeared polished and statue like. However, Batoni made this painting original and unique to him by his choices of color and symbolic representations of The Republic of Venice. Batoni probably wanted to make such an elegant and detailed painting to show the tranquility of Italian art during the Golden Age of Venice. This time period was all about the rebirth of the fine arts and The Triumph of Venice has become a perfect representation of this. Depicted by the painting, the woman representing Venice is centered and being pulled on a cart because Batoni wanted to express the importance and power that the city had. Everyone else represented in the painting was either giving something to Venice or was speaking of the city’s glory. The presence of ancient Roman gods and goddesses was not only a characteristic of neoclassical art, but also makes the painting more powerful and elegant through their appearance in the piece. Batoni did this to express his feelings towards The Republic of Venice. He wanted to show how the city was flourishing and how its fame and glory was something to be noticed, even by the ancient Roman gods. Batoni wanted to create a piece that he knew would be remembered as art students passed by his studio on The Grand Tour.

When first viewing The Triumph of Venice viewers see an old painting illustrating some people in front of The Grand Canal, but upon further review one discovers its hidden symbols and what the painting represents as a whole. Each aspect present has a meaning and interpretation. The color choice conveys many different emotions upon viewers like happiness and excitement. The winged-lions are symbols of The Republic of Venice the Roman gods present were selected based on their relevance to Venice and the fine arts. All of the artistic choices Batoni selected to be present in The Triumph of Venice were chosen to give the best interpretation of the Golden Age of Venice that he could possibly give. Today one can truly sense what life and art was like during this time period thanks to Batoni’s detailed works. They maybe not have been considered relevant during his time period, but today they are viewed as masterpieces and give viewers a look into Italy’s past.

Works Cited

Bowron, Edgar, and Peter Kerber. "POMPEO BATONI: PRINCE OF PAINTERS IN EIGHTEENTH- CENTURY ROME." Wiley Online Library. 31 Oct. 2008. Web. 9 Nov. 2015.

Zaki, Fady. "Neoclassical Art Movement." IdentifyThisArt.com. Identify This Art, 17 February 2013. Web. 9 Nov. 2015.

Tice, Jim, Erik Steiner, and Allen Ceen. "18th Century Rome and the Grand Tour." Imago Urbis. University of Oregon, 2008. Web. 9 Nov. 2015.

Os, Henk Van. "All That Glitters." Hermitage Amsterdam. 10 June 2004. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.

""The Triumph of Venice" by Pompeo Girolamo Batoni." HumanitiesWeb. 28 Oct. 2012. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.


An Image Worth One Thousand Words

Photo By: fracturedfotos
Chris Hondros, the famous photojournalist, covered most of the major conflicts in the world since the 1990s and has appeared on major American newspapers such as the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post. His vast collection of photographs give a mere resemblance within the context of what circumstance each specific picture is endeavoring. Over the years, Hondros became a well-known and respected photojournalist who allowed his viewers experience first hand what each picture in his collection had to offer. The specific picture, War in Shadows and Light exhibited in the Gallery in Art and Design at the North Carolina Museum of Art presents a context standpoint to it’s viewers like none other before. This picture captured can be elaborated to persuade its viewers, while taking a more connotative reasoning of why Hondros captured this moment in history. Hondros wants you to examine the intrinsic social and political context that can be viewed as well. I will inform and come to a reasoning of why Hondros wanted War in Shadows and Light to touch his readers in the social aspects within the context of his photograph.

When you first approach and examine the picture taken in the museum and read that the picture was taken in 2005, the natural instinct is to think back and examine which major events took place in Liberia within that year. Whether or not off the top of your head you can contemplate which major event was taking place at that time within this country, that point of view can be eliminated because that is not the photojournalist’s reasoning. Hondros’ main goal for this specific picture was for it to be publicly recognized because of the social aspects going on in Liberia that still continue to this day. For example, if you fasten your eyes specifically on the background of this picture you can automatically assume this is a third world country. What is the first thought that pops into your mind when you see a picture with a third world country? A small feeling of sympathy? A striking sense of anger? Deja Vu filled with past events that correlate to this photograph? All three of these examples of immediate thinking that occur when viewing the background image of Liberia are mainly first world assumptions from a majority of people that live in the United States. “Wow, look at the culture and way of life the people of Liberia have to endure.” As a student enrolled at North Carolina State University, I can almost automatically come to the assumption Hondros did not publicly display this photograph for any of those reasons. In my eyes, Hondros thought this photograph was a masterpiece because of the social images that come to a viewer's mind when examining this. It can also be molded into many ways of perception that the viewer can take under their own discretion.

Another main viewpoint that I am convinced Hondros wants his viewers to examine is the aesthetic aspect of the photograph. When carefully scanning the picture, you can see the Liberian commander Joseph Duo physically jumping high in the air in what seems to be a major positive event that had occurred. Without providing you with any information or details of what happened to cause Joseph Duo to jump in this manner prior to the snapshot, you can assume something inspirational just occurred. This can automatically be derived from looking at Joseph’s facial expressions. His mouth is drastically opened to where not even a smile can express enough joy to express what event just took place. His eyebrows, dimples, and hair are all in pure disorder at the same time because of the action he is presenting. Joseph’s arms are also fragrantly thrown up in the air proclaiming this notorious moment. His body language is a critical giveaway that something very positive had taken place when Hondros captured this moment on photograph.
Taking an even closer look, examining the background image of this third world country allows you to realize that there are many building and tower-like complexes that suit this picture. Most of these homes or businesses in this community aren’t in tip-top enough condition for family living quarters. Even as some of the buildings look as if they are are about to crumble down and collapse at any moment, some of them are painted in vividly bright colors that resemble a rainbow. The photograph is taken from such a far distance that you can’t see what is specifically painted on the side of the walls on the buildings, but one can assume that they were paintings that took a long time to finish and that the community takes pride in these expressions. These paintings on the side of the walls on the buildings represent an aesthetic, positive vibe that can be seen and heard throughout the particular city in Liberia. No matter what the political, economic, or social standing Libera was facing when this picture was taken, the people in this city still have both vast hope and strong roots in their country. No matter what war or tragic event takes place in their city, these people are convinced that they are strong and will neither be shaken nor torn down by tragedy, and that is what the paintings on the side of the buildings represent.

Photo By: International Committee of the Red Cross
While taking in both the social and aesthetic aspects in this picture, the author is also trying to create a sense of expression. While examining the background, bridge, and people in this photograph, everything and everyone seems to have the life sucked out of them. The sky is a dark, hazy color that only brings upon gloom to the atmosphere. The man on the left side of the image seems to be another soldier in what might be a current battle going on. War only indicate hurt and pain in the long run, even to the victor. The grass on the right side of the picture is very patchy and uncared for, which resembles a possible broken Liberia, where the situations and events in this country may of been a rough patch for the citizens. All three of these specific details can make any viewer assume this country is on it’s last straw politically, socially and financially. The one silver lining that the author shoots at the last moment contrasts and defeats all of the darkness, as you see Joseph Duo grasping for joy. Whether Liberia had just won the war or made a crucial turning point in the war when this photograph was taken, the man jumping in the middle of the bridge looking at the photographer represents a luminary that this country still is chugging along. Hondros is able to tell his point of view because of the physical movement made by Joseph Duo. The image as a whole shows that no matter how terrible of a situation or predicament an individual or group of people can be in, there is always a small hope or aspiration that can be positively shown to motivate others.

If you ever come across this specific image by Chris Hondros, whether it be sometime during the next week, month, year or decade(s), you should think and examine the mood, cultural, historical, social and aesthetic aspects to this picture carefully. There are many viewpoints to be taken in terms of why the photojournalist took the image at this specific time and place. This art piece is no exception to the  famous saying, “A picture can speak a thousand words.” As a viewer, it is important to not only examine this photograph with a more thorough examination of why the photojournalist took this picture, but to bring that mentality along with you to every art piece and photograph you stumble upon as well. If you are able to bring this mindset to the table, you can open up a new literature world that can start a notion for others to have the same perception as you. This to me, is what Hondros wants his viewers to examine while looking at his photographs, along with other photojournalists’.

Work Cited
George, Rose. "Testament by Chris Hondros-Review." Theguardian.com. N.p., 23 May 2014. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.”
Murrmann, Mark. "The Dangerous, Harrowing Work of War Photographer Chris Hondros." Mother Jones. N.p., 11 Apr. 2014. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.”
"Liberia: Conflict Profile." Insightonconflict.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.”
Left, Sarah. "War in Liberia." Theguardian.com. N.p., 4 Aug. 2003. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.”
Hondros, Chris. "Windows on War." Sagepub.com. North Carolina State University, Sept. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2015.”


The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius

The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius by Pierre-Jacques Volaire
Pierre-Jacques Volaire painted The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius, which takes Mount Vesuvius’s eruption and combines serenity and devastation. It was painted in 1771, just a few years before Europe’s Romanticism movement, in what can be described as the Pre-Romanticism period. During the Pre-Romanticism movement, the public slowly fell away from the more grandeur and sophisticated Neoclassical attitude, and accepted sincerer things. Landscape paintings and simpler forms of expression characterize this movement, and these art types cluttered the artistic scene. The painting’s importance can be narrowed down to its historical significance. In AD 79, Mount Vesuvius erupted and completely devastated a Roman city called Pompeii. This painting depicts what it possibly could have looked like. When describing Volaire’s painting, a few things come to mind. It can be seen as a landscape painting, a disaster narrative painting, and it lacks many colors overall. Landscape paintings offer a serene feeling to the viewer, as standstill painting that gives a feeling like a quiet countryside, meadow, or log cabin. Disaster narratives, such as a painting of a ship tossed at sea or a poem about a raging storm, present nature’s power and show man’s limitations against nature. Despite the typical view of landscapes as serene and disaster narratives as chaotic, Volaire took up the challenge in combining these two opposite concepts into one piece, and added different color and contrasts aspects to aid this process.

In order to understand more about the painting, more must be known about the artist. But unfortunately, not much is known about Pierre-Jacques Volaire. When referring to great artists, Volaire does not fit such a crowd. His paintings will not be found in many museums, and upon hearing his name, not many people will acknowledge that they know who he is. However, what is known about his life does point to his artistic lifestyle. He came from an artistic family tree, because he was the grandson, son, and nephew of famous artists and decorators in Toulon, France. In fact, as a child, his father was the official city painter of Toulon. When Volaire first began, he worked with Vernet, another painter, on several projects. Although, once Volaire traveled to Naples, it happened there that he finally began his solo work. There, he first started making a name for himself and separated from his collaboration with Vernet. In Naples, he began his various paintings on Mount Vesuvius. In his paintings he focused primarily tending “towards a more concise and more efficient painting” (Saiello). In order to do this, he used fewer colors, utilizing contrasts, and would produce a lighter effect in his paintings. He decided against making his paintings extremely extravagant with many colors and, instead, opted to let his works come across as soberer and more poetic. In doing this, his Vesuvius landscape paintings can be viewed as both chaotic and serene, in a sense. Chaotic because of the destruction illustrated from the erupting volcano, yet serene due to his calming colors and simple, precise design.

Volaire specialized in landscape paintings, and most of his works fit under that particular category.
City of Pompeii: Photo by Katie Schenk
Landscape paintings have existed since ancient times, when Greeks and Romans would paint landscapes on walls. However, once the Roman empire fell, landscape paintings seemed to die off and became less popular. They were viewed simply as religious or biblical paintings during its decline. Later, the Netherlands began to pick the style back up, and not until the 17th century did the classical landscape painting begin to rise and be recognized as a popular art form. Generally, the typical landscape piece featured a quiet countryside filled with trees, rocks, or the occasional animal. However, Volaire decided to take a new approach. Instead of the typical landscape gentleness, Volaire chose to take Mount Vesuvius’s eruption and create a landscape scene that was otherwise chaotic. Firstly, landscapes usually have more color. In The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius, there seems to be only two color options: orange, and black, or what could be described as dark. These two colors create a genuine contrast when combined into one painting with no other colors. The difference in color between the lava, the moon, and the dark colors keep the viewers’ eyes in constant movement, always noticing different aspects of the contrast. Artists do this intentionally, because this keeps the viewer from getting bored with the piece and moving on to another one. Even the people in the painting are bathed in a menacing glow from the volcano, and had they not been painted this way, they would end up being almost completely overlooked in the painting. As long this contrast remains present, the viewer will notice different things constantly. Volaire elected to let the painting’s main focus be the volcano, rather than the city or the people. Quite a bold move, considering Volaire made the volcano much larger than it needed to be. In fact, he could have chosen to set the volcano way back in the background and allow the people fleeing the city to become the main subject of the painting. But Volaire wanted to be different. By permitting the volcano to sit as the monstrosity that it is, it creates a sense of hopelessness for the city folk, as if the volcano looms too large to escape from. In comparison, the city sits extremely small in the painting, almost as small as the people. Obviously, Pompeii could not have been that small, but creating the city as little as it seems illustrates that the volcano will ultimately win. This also plays into the historical significance, as Mount Vesuvius did, in fact, end up overcoming the city completely.

A piece on a natural disaster such as Mount Vesuvius’s eruption can be classified as a “disaster narrative” style painting. Disaster narratives can come in many forms: poetry, fiction, drama, and landscape style paintings, to list a few. Disaster narratives exhibit the power nature holds and show how sometimes nature can be too much for man to contain. Therefore, it can also demonstrate the limitations of man as a whole. This painting would really be viewed as a polar opposite of the typical landscape paintings. Most people would tend to think of a more laid back scene as a landscape rather than a volcano erupting. Volaire combined landscape paintings with disaster narratives to create quite a piece. Apparently, during the late 18th century, volcanoes did become a popular painting subject, and Volaire seemed to be another to hop on the volcano craze. The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius was not the only volcano painting Volaire painted either. Volaire’s other paintings on Vesuvius contained the enormous mountain, and most have similar names. His obsession for the mountain remains evident in his paintings, as he produced several “Vesuvius at night” creations. Combining his love for landscapes and volcanoes resulted in the fusion of serenity and disaster in his Vesuvius paintings and they display his talents.

This painting illustrates what happened a long time ago in AD 79. Mount Vesuvius happens to be the most dangerous volcanoes in Europe. In AD 79, this statement rang true as it devastated Pompeii and another city nearby. Vesuvius would cause occasional tremors around Pompeii, and people did not think much of them. However, on this particular day in AD 79, this unfortunate overlooking came to doom the people in Pompeii.
Eruption of Vesuvius: Photo by Eric Chan
Thousands of Romans who lived there perished as the volcanic ash covered the city and burned the residents. The ash fell so quickly and heavily, that the entire city was blanketed and preserved, to the point where even bodies were left almost exactly as they had died. As unfortunate as the destruction of Pompeii was, its preservations lead to remarkable archaeological discoveries. Nearly everything we know about Roman life and culture during those times comes from what was revealed from Pompeii. This historic eruption aided future generations and helps us understand exactly how the Romans operated so long ago. In painting this work, Volaire raises the event’s importance and helps us keep in mind that nature can cause catastrophic damage in the blink of an eye, and we need to be prepared for something like this. By creating the people in the painting so minute, Volaire displays man’s helplessness against such an occurrence. He did not have to create the people so small, but he did it to relay this message to the viewers. Man may not be as powerful as we would like to think, as demonstrated by the events that happened with Mount Vesuvius. Volaire aided the Pre-Romanticism period with this painting, forcing man back down to earth from his elevated ways of the Neoclassicism movement beforehand.

Although not well known, Pierre-Jacques Volaire created a piece that transcends the status quo, and makes a name for himself in the process. Creating a piece that seems both destructive and, in some sense, elegantly calm, makes him differ from the norm and allows the viewer to translate it in their own way. As calming as landscapes can be, and as riveting as disaster narratives are, Volaire makes them one in the same. His color choices and use of contrast add a calmer feeling to the painting as a whole, and illustrate his sober and poetic feel. The historical significance behind the painting reflects the event’s importance that occurred in AD 79. Even though Pompeii was a great city, its end state reveals much about the Roman life, and serves a great educational value to archaeologists. The painting remains, possibly, Volaire’s most popular works, and the reasons for this point to its complex nature and the ability to view it however one pleases. Volaire does not disappoint in this painting and its importance in history makes this a timeless piece that will allow viewers to reflect on what it was possibly like for the citizens of Pompeii during that fateful day in AD 79.



Works Cited

Daly, Nicholas. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/victorian_studies/v053/53.2.daly.html

http://www.getty.edu/education/teachers/classroom_resources/curricula/landscapes/background1.html

Saiello, Emilie Beck. http://www.thearttribune.com/Pierre-Jacques-Volaire-1729-1799.html

http://www.britannica.com/art/oil-painting

http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/color-meaning.html

M. C. Escher's Mastery of the Impossible

Bond of Union
“Are you really sure that a floor can't also be a ceiling?” M. C. Escher once said when referring to how he develops his artwork. In many of M. C. Escher’s artwork, Escher messes with people’s brains by using common assumptions about the world and flipping them on their head. Through Escher’s lifetime, he develops unique style inspired by mathematics to make illusions and optically complex pieces that make the viewer think deeply about the piece. Yet closed off by the world, M. C. Escher influences many mathematicians and artists through his thought provoking pieces. Through mental assumptions and geometry, M. C. Escher creates mathematically inspired art that challenges what people think as possible. In particular, Escher’s Bond of Union explores the infinite complexities of mathematics and relationships.

In the art piece Bond of Union, Escher uses complex geometric designs and human qualities to create a connection between the shapes in the piece. The spiral spheres in the center of the painting connect showing the bond between man and woman. He uses familiar shapes to create comfort and intrigue in the piece. Escher uses the dark shading and lighting to create an immersive atmosphere and focuses on the faces in the print. His use of shapes and repetition enforce the concept that the faces have a bond with each other because every other sphere lacks personality. Escher uses the shapes to describe relationships between people as complex and confusing but somehow works. Escher style of mental imagery transform this print because the complex geometry and advanced lighting create thoughts inside the audience about the meaning and the importance of relationships. What does M. C. Escher do to create these mind bending art pieces and how have they challenged the way people view art.

In order to understand why M. C. Escher was able to produce mind-bending prints, we need to understand where Escher grew up. M. C. Escher was born in Holland and his father was a civil engineer. He wanted to be an architect so he applied to the School for Architecture and Decorative Arts in Haarlem. While at college, Escher discovered his passion for drawing geometric shapes and making mind bending art. Escher moved to Rome and started drawing roman architecture and Italian Countryside. His early art featured heavy Italian influence. With many of his prints, Escher would experiment with lighting and how it was received by the viewer. In 1935, Escher left Italy and started to focus more on “mental imagery” than on landscapes. He dove into metamorphosis and complex architecture mazes like his famous print Relativity. Living in scenic environments and his passion for architecture leads M. C Escher to create art that inspires both beauty and complexity.
Belvedere
Many people have researched M. C. Escher’s work and look at how he creates illusions that look impossible. Researchers have broken down M. C. Escher’s works into five impossible shapes that mess with the brain. Escher uses these shapes with illusions to create complex architecture that confuses the brain. The five types of impossible images that Escher exhibits in his art use the triangle, the stairway, the fork, the Escher Cube and the Steps. Escher uses these images in almost every piece he creates. By adding these pieces to his artwork Escher creates thoughts inside the audience as they try to comprehend the art. Many people can look at his art for hours because of the intricate design and details. For example, M. C. Escher’s famous piece, Belvedere. This piece uses impossible images to create a complexing tower. While observing the structure, one can observe the building’s foundation is built as an Escher Cube. The supports in this piece lie both behind and in front of each other, creating an illusion that messes with the brain. Escher’s uses of this cube was not the only shape he master in his art career.
Waterfall
Another example of impossible shapes used in Escher’s art can be found the Waterfall. In this painting Escher focuses on the impossible triangle. He uses the assumption of gravity to mess with the audience’s minds as the water flows up the duct. Either the water must be going up the duct and down the waterfall or down the duct and up the waterfall. Both of the scenarios that the audience sees establish logically impossible interpretations. Throughout this piece, the brain to constantly try to comprehend it as one looks at it. Escher wants the audience to think about his pieces more so he creates these optical illusions to trick the audience. However since the piece lacks possibility the brain will never fully comprehend what happens in the piece. One must research and dive into why the brain claims this piece cannot exist in reality. Escher takes the basic idea of a duct and spins it to create a mind bending puzzle.

Ascending and Descending
Our last image focusing on impossible images can be found Escher’s Ascending and Descending. This piece conveys the impossible staircase. In one direction, the pathway always rises while in the other direction the pathway always falls. This contradicts the natural law of order tricking the brain into these optical illusions. Escher refers to this piece as a “trick” because the audience can imagine a building that would be built like this. Escher’s uses the impossible staircase to create the illusion of movement and rise and fall in his create. By putting this in his creation it gives the audience the illusion that the piece constantly changes and encourages the audience to look deeper into the print. Escher’s mastery of impossible shapes boosts him into art history because he was able to create things people thought were impossible.
Relativity
Escher not only uses impossible shapes in his artwork, he also uses unique themes to create intrigue in the audience. By theming his art, Escher can resonate with his audience more and make a lasting impact. Escher was interested in the impossible and what others comprehend and that reflects in his pieces. He wanted to challenge the natural assumptions of the audience and the more the audience studied the art the more they would find. His love for “tricking” and creating optical illusions allows Escher to create meaningful art that will be appreciated by many. For example, the piece Relativity uses the theme of relativity to create a unique piece of art. This outstanding piece perfectly describes relative as a theme. The piece features many staircases that wrap around to create a masterpiece. At first glance this piece looks impossible, however upon further inspection, one can comprehend the piece. Bruno Ernst, author of “The Magic of M. C. Escher,” broke down this print into three categories: left-learners, right-learners, and uprights. Each kind inhabits their own environment properly and that creates three possible views for the piece. The piece creates what seems like an impossible image with three different universes with different gravities at the same time. Escher uses these three views to create a different piece for everyone who sees the print. The multiple views cause the piece to constantly change as the audience inspects it. With mastery of relativism, Escher creates three different world within the same print that creates a unique experience for the viewer.

Print Gallery
Another theme Escher experiments with through his art career focuses on the transition between 2D and 3D. Escher creates many pieces that combine two dimensional world with three dimensional worlds. In the piece, Print gallery, Escher has a boy looking at a two dimensional painting that becomes a three dimensional town. This strange piece uses the contradiction of dimensional shifts to confuse the audience. The shifts between dimensions creates an illusion that the audience looks at the gallery painting when in reality one is observing the piece inside a piece. This confuses piece conveys the magic of diving into an undiscovered piece and becoming part of its world. This illusion of dimensions inspires the audience to look at each painting like it’s an actual world and not just a painting. Escher’s use of dimensions create an impossible image that summarizes his experiences with art.

Cube with Magic Ribbon
The last theme discussed in this post will focus on inversion or having the characteristics of two separate things but not being full one thing. Escher uses this confusing theme in many prints to invoke thought and challenge the audience. A good example of this theme happens in his piece, Cube with Magic Ribbon. This piece looks simple at first glance by having a cube with a ribbon inside it. However upon further inspection, the ribbons actually create two Mobius strips that loop throughout the print. The ribbon uses inversion because the ribbon looks as if it lies either inside or outside the cube and either on one side or the other side. This mind bending puzzle’s simplicity and polish makes it seem easy to figure yet it still confuses the audience. Escher’s use of themes develop creations that seem impossible to conceive.

In conclusion, Escher’s art has become well know all over the world for being confusing and mathematical. His use of geometry and mental assumptions, Escher leads the audience into a world where anything can be what the person sees. His art has inspired people all over the world and challenges the minds of his audience. Through M. C. Escher’s life he was surrounded by great architecture and using his passion for architecture, Escher created some of the most important pieces in art history. In the piece, Bond of Union, Escher’s thought invoking style has made people question what their eyes see. M. C. Escher enjoys challenging the audiences’ assumption of possibility by tricking them with their assumptions and geometry.



Works Cited:









Monday, November 9, 2015

The Triumph of Venice: Mid-Unit Post

Photo from http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/149778

“Peace and War”

This is another painting by Pompeo Girolamo Batoni. This picture is relevant to the painting I chose to do my Unit 4 project on because it further shows the style of painting that was most popular during the time period. The painting “Peace and War” also references Roman mythology. In this painting Roman gods are used to compare peace and war.
Photo from http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/time-unveiling-truth-33707

“Time Unveiling Truth”

This is a painting by the Italian painter Giovanni Battista Tiepolo that was painted during the same time period as Pompeo Girolamo Batoni. This painting follows the theme of the time period of using paintings as allegories. It uses personification to represent none human things like in the “Triumph of Venice”. The painting also uses objects to represent other themes present in the painting.
Photo from http://www.artclon.com/paintings/thetis-takes-achilles-from-the-centaur-chiron_4323.html

“Achilles and the Centaur Chiron”

This is another of Pompeo Girolamo Batoni’s famous paintings. Although this piece was painted at a later time, it still possess some of Batoni’s and the Golden Age of Venice’s common traits in artworks. This painting uses Roman mythology to express Italian culture. The media is also oil on canvas which was the popular way of doing paintings at the time. 
Photo from http://www.wikiart.org/en/raphael/school-of-athens-detail-from-right-hand-side-showing-diogenes-on-the-steps-and-euclid-1511
“The School of Athens”

This is a piece by Anton Raphael Mengs after the artist Raphael. This painting is relevant to “The Triumph of Venice” because it is also a piece of neoclassical art which is what Batoni was most known for. Neoclassicism is the taking inspiration from “classic art” and culture of Ancient Greece or Ancient Rome and creating new pieces of visual art, literature, theatre, music, and architecture. Meng’s was also considered Batoni’s greatest rival, so I feel like comparing the two’s styles is important in understanding neoclassicism.
Photo from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_the_Horatii


“Oath of the Horatii”

This is a painting by the French artist Jacques-Louis David. The painting is depicting a scene from Roman legend, the fighting between the two cities of Rome and Alba Longa. Its theme is the self-sacrifice for one’s country and patriotism. This painting relates to “The Triumph of Venice” because it is another piece of neoclassicism, thus expressing Ancient Roman culture and legends. This particular piece became one of the best known paintings in the neoclassical style.

Bond of Union



The painting was made by M. C Escher and emphasizes metamorphosis in art. Once the viewer focuses on one point and starts exploring the painting it constantly changes into something else. This painting also shows how M. C Escher uses math to created geometric paintings that interest the viewer.

This piece of art was made by Octavio Ocampo and uses metamorphosis to create two worlds inside one painting. This painting changes between mountains and horses depending on how you look at it. Its unique style differs from that of M. C. Escher, but Ocampo uses the same concepts as Escher to create amazing pieces of art.

This painting uses symmetry to create a flowing painting that emphasizes unity between everything in the painting. The symmetry and the shape of this art follows a similar display as M. C. Escher’s Bond of Union. This creator uses geometry in his shapes to create a pattern that people can appreciate.

This painting by Van Gogh uses unity to create a painting that flows and feels like one. Gogh uses the swirling brush strokes and color palettes to create unify the world. It creates a atmosphere of being together and the feeling of everything belongs together.


This painting uses metamorphosis to create an illusion of two things happening at the same time. This style is used in M. C. Escher’s paintings and helps painting carry multiple meanings. The painting has flow through its colors by using red on the face and gray in the background.

The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius Mid-Unit 4 Post

Photo by Sigmund
In The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius, most of the painting is taken up by Mount Vesuvius itself. This volcano is important in this painting because it was this volcano that destroyed the city of Pompeii, the city in the painting. Most of the painting itself consists of oranges and grays or blacks, but the only place the orange is really shown is on Vesuvius. This draws the most attention to the mountain itself. The artist made the mountain very large, in comparison to the rest of the painting, in order to draw more attention to it. This image relates to the painting, as it is an image of the monstrosity that is, Mt. Vesuvius.

Photo by William Chevillon
This painting, painted by Pierre-Jacques Volaire, is The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius. Volaire was the son of the official town painter in Toulon, France. It can be said that it was in his genes to be a painter. Volaire’s work centralizes around landscapes, and he has done several pieces on Mount Vesuvius. The life of Volaire is not really quite detailed, as there is not much documented about his life. He was not the most famous painter and his works were not the grandest works one could see. Despite the unpopularity of his works, as you can see in this image, what he did was pretty impressive.

Photo by cliff hellis
In many of his paintings, Volaire would paint landscapes. Landscape paintings can be dated back to ancient times, and after the fall of the Roman empire, they seemed to die off. They were viewed as religious or figural pieces, and it was not until the 17th century that they began to regain popularity. This image in particular is a view from the mountain Vesuvius. Landscapes can be breathtaking pieces, such as The Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius. The different colors combined with the layering of the people, city, water, and mountain, create a stunning work of art that seems to extend for miles within it. 

Photo by cliff hellis
Pompeii was the ancient city destroyed by Mount Vesuvius. In this image, a small portion of modern day Pompeii is shown. We have learned much of what we know about ancient Roman times from what we have uncovered from Pompeii. Since the city was burned and covered with volcanic ash in such a brief and quick instant, much of what Pompeii held has been preserved. This allowed archaeologists to learn so much about what life was like so many years ago. The painting depicts Pompeii in the middle of the painting, and due to its close proximity to Vesuvius, Pompeii really did not have much of a chance after an eruption of that magnitude.

Photo by Forest Service
The last picture is a picture of Mount St. Helens in Washington state erupting in 1980. Although less catastrophic than Vesuvius, the eruption of Mount St. Helens still shows the magnitude of volcanic eruptions and the dangers that come with them. This image is relates to the painting because volcanic eruptions are not just an everyday occurrence. They are devastating events that have been and will continue to be studied by scientists as to find out more on why and when. The people of Pompeii serve as great examples as to why volcanoes are not just mountains that make smoke every so often.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Mid Unit Post

Photo By: Mike Fiechtner
This photo of Liberia is significant because it is where the original image was taken. Liberia is a country on the West African coast and was one of the more stable African countries before the civil war took place in 1989. Liberia is also very poor and was once known as one of the prosperous black republics in the 1950s.

This photo was taken by a news photographer named Chris Hondros during Liberia's 14-year civil war. The man in the photo is Joseph Duo, a Liberian commander who had just finished firing a rocket launcher towards the enemy during battle. Hondros snapped the photograph as Duo jumped in the air and gave a war cry. The image then became famous and was placed in magazines all over the world. It became a symbol of the prolonged conflict taking place in the country of Liberia.

 
Photo By: smiletiger
These Liberian soldiers relate because the Liberian soldier in the original piece is named Joseph Duo and is the focal point of the artwork. The Armed Forces of Liberia is now as the AFL and has origins traced back to a militia that was formed by the first black colonists in what is now Liberia.  It was founded as the Liberian Frontier Force in 1908, and retitled in 1956.
Photo By: Davor Pavelic
The first Liberian Civil war was an internal conflict in Liberia that lasted from 1989 to 1997. This killed over 200,000 people and eventually led to the involvement of the Economic Community of West African States and of the United Nations. The peace did not last long, and in 1999 the Second Liberian Civil War broke out.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Soccer in America



Works Cited

Collins, Sandra. (2006, July). Soccer & Society. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=d559eda0-a2ee-4eb2-8e09-0de3d41dfabb%40sessionmgr120&vid=0&hid=101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=20917294&db=a9h.

Fitzgerald, Daniel. (2013, September 22). 15 Reasons Soccer Is the Best Sport in the World. Retrieved from http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1783623-15-reasons-soccer-is-the-best-sport-in-the-world.

Kels, Dayton. (2015, September 9). 7 Reasons Why Soccer is the Dumbest Sport Ever. Retrieved from http://sportzedge.com/2014/07/01/7-reasons-why-soccer-kind-of-sucks/.

Kruschewsky, Gabriela. (2014, May 14). Wake Up, America. Here’s Why Soccer is the World’s Best Sport. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/14/soccer-worlds-best-sport_n_5248061.html.

Paine, Neil. (2014, June 16). Why Isn’t the U.S. Men’s National Team Better at Soccer?. Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-isnt-the-u-s-mens-national-team-better-at-soccer/.

Sports Fans; The Good and The Bad



Works Cited

Rudd, A. (2010, December 1). An Exploratory Investigation of Sportsmanship Attitudes Among College Student Basketball Fans. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/792664610?pq-origsite=summon



Almendrala, A. (2015). How Being A Sports Fan Makes You Happier And Healthier. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/30/sports-fan-mental-health-benefits_n_6565314.html



Jacobson, B. (n.d.). The Social Psychology of the Creation of a Sports Fan Identity: A Theoretical Review of the Literature. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol5Iss2/FanDevelopment.htm



(n.d.). Retrieved October 31, 2015, from https://www.saintmarys.edu/files/drach final draft.doc

The Growth of the Smash Community


Works Cited:
(1): Cowherd, C. (n.d.). Colin Cowherd is upset about eSports- 'The Herd' Retrieved October 29, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f85kWTiSue4
(2): Ahn, K., Isaac, M., & Salmon, T. (2008). Endogenous Group Formation. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00357.x/full
(3): Lee, D., & Schoenstedt, L. J. (2011). Comparison of eSports and traditional sports consumption motives. The ICHPER-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 6(2), 39-44. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/917532561?accountid=12725
(4): Seo, Y., & Jung, S. (2014, October 4). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://joc.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/05/11/1469540514553711
(5): Rad, C. (n.d.). 27 Million People Watched the Biggest Counter-Strike Tournament Ever - IGN. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/08/25/27-million-people-watched-the-biggest-counter-strike-tournament-ever

(6): CALIXTO, J. (2014, July 16). Melee the masterpiece, Melee the demon. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://killscreendaily.com/articles/melee-masterpiece-melee-demon/